Article 17 web tool

Log in
Article 17 > Species summary

Species assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a species belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that species.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The 'Data sheet info' includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per species.

The 'Audit trail' includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad
Current selection: 2013-2018, Amphibians, Triturus carnifex, All bioregions. Annexes II, IV. Show all Amphibians
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Population Habitat for the species Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution
area (km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRR
Min
Member State
code		 Reporting units Alternative units
Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate
AT N/A N/A 103 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
HR N/A N/A 31 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT 176 770 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
SI 122 134 N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
AT N/A N/A 83 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
CZ N/A N/A 30 grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
HR N/A N/A 53 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT 699 4432 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
SI 366 378 N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
HR N/A N/A 49 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT 473 1638 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
CZ N/A N/A 3 grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
HU N/A N/A 12 grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
Max
Best value Unit Type est. Method Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRP Unit Occupied
suff.		 Unoccupied
suff.		 Status Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 Distrib. Method % MS
AT ALP 5700 11.86 x > N/A N/A 103 grids1x1 minimum c 14.01 - > Unk N U1 - poor poor poor U1 U1 - U1 - noChange noChange 4300 b 18.61
HR ALP 7200 14.98 x x N/A N/A 31 grids1x1 minimum c 4.22 x x Unk XX x unk unk unk XX XX N/A N/A 2000 c 8.66
IT ALP 28200 58.69 = ≈ 176 770 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 64.35 - > N Y U1 - good poor poor U1 U1 - U1 - genuine genuine 12600 b 54.55
SI ALP 6949 14.46 = ≈ 122 134 N/A grids1x1 minimum b 17.41 x > N N U1 u good unk poor U1 U1 x U1 - noChange noChange 4200 b 18.18
AT CON 4900 4 x > N/A N/A 83 grids1x1 minimum b 2.67 x > Unk N U1 x poor poor poor U1 U1 x U1 x method method 3700 b 4.63
CZ CON 900 0.74 = ≈ N/A N/A 30 grids1x1 estimate a 0.97 = > Y U1 - good poor poor U1 U1 - U2 - method method 700 a 0.88
HR CON 6500 5.31 x x N/A N/A 53 grids1x1 minimum c 1.71 x x Unk XX x unk unk unk XX XX N/A N/A 2300 c 2.88
IT CON 97800 79.93 - > 699 4432 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 82.66 - > Y U2 - poor bad bad U2 U2 - U1 - genuine genuine 64000 b 80.10
SI CON 12252 10.01 = ≈ 366 378 N/A grids1x1 minimum b 11.99 x > N N U1 u good unk poor U1 U1 x U1 - noChange noChange 9200 b 11.51
HR MED 5100 5.96 x x N/A N/A 49 grids1x1 minimum c 4.44 x x Unk XX x unk unk unk XX XX N/A N/A 2700 c 5.82
IT MED 80400 94.04 = ≈ 473 1638 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 95.56 - > Y FV = good poor good FV U1 - U1 - genuine genuine 43700 b 94.18
CZ PAN 500 50 = ≈ N/A N/A 3 grids1x1 estimate a 20 - >> Y U1 - good bad poor U2 U2 - U2 - genuine genuine 200 a 20
HU PAN 500 50 - > N/A N/A 12 grids1x1 estimate b 80 - > N Y U1 - poor poor poor U1 U1 - U1 = noChange genuine 800 b 80
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range		 Trend FRR Min Max Best value Unit Status
Population		 Trend FRP Unit Status
Hab. for
species		 Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status
Future
prosp.		 Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 2012 CS 2012 CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 2001-06 status
with
backcasting		 Target 1
EU28 ALP 48049 2XP x 432 1038 735 grids1x1 2XP - 2XP - 2XP MTX - U1 - nc nc U1 C

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 122352 2XP - 1231 4976 3103.5 grids1x1 2XP - 2XP - 2XP MTX - U1 - gen nc U1 C

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 MED 85500 2XP = 522 1687 1104.5 grids1x1 2XP - 2XP = 2XP MTX - U1 - nc nc U1 C

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 PAN 1000 2XP - 15 grids1x1 2XP - >> 2XP - 2XP MTX - U2 - gen nc U2 B1

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.